A strategic analysis of jetblue airways

A key investigation of jetblue aviation routes The US carrier industry patterns have caused aircraft organizations, including Jet Blue to battle for endurance. Retirement has caused a lack of pilots and teachers. Flying schools experience less teachers and hours expected to prepare new pilots. In 2008, raw petroleum costs expanded to a record $140 per barrel (Thompson, Strickland, government representatives were entrusted to deal with all air terminal security. Expanded screening for things and travelers, size cutoff points on liquids and x-beam investigations. With the extra safety efforts, came monetary weights to the aircraft business. Fly Blue’s key purpose When Jet Blue’s was established, David Nelleman needed air travel to caring and fun. The key purpose was to offer clients a low rebate aircraft bearer with the solaces of home. As the principal carrier to offer electronic tagging, Jet Blue needed to postpone its trips as opposed to dropping them. Specialists were permitted to telecommute and clients delighted in gourmet snacks, espressos, seat TVs with satellite radio and film stations. Stream Blue started to investigate expanding the investor and client esteems with the development of New York’s JFK Airport with 8 am and 9 am flights. This was cheerful to Jet Blue officials; they needed to engage more youthful clients, princely New Yorkers, and those venturing out to New York City. Opening up this new terminal has spared $50 million in labor, fuel, and vouchers. Presently, the organization serves in excess of 53 goals (Thompson et al., 2010). JetBlue’s money related targets and achievement in accomplishing Although Jet Blue’s stock dropped by half in the five years, incomes became 185% somewhere in the range of 2003 and 2007, their working costs became 222% during a similar period. The misfortune in income was accused on the expense of fuel (532% expansion) and intrigue cost (658% increment). Stream Blue chose to take a moderate money related procedure in which the y kept up high fluid proportions comparative with the other significant carriers (Thompson et al., 2010). Stream Blue was millions behind the contender yet grew new value capital and credit, which was expected to stay with the, and permit them to keep up solid liquidity. Appraisal of upper hand Cost. JetBlue works at a lower cost than its rivals. As per Thompson, Strickland and Gamble (2010), JetBlue’s absolute working costs were 12.17 per income traveler mile in 2008 versus $18.18 for American Airline, $18.18 for Continental, $20.95 for Delta, $13.85 for Southwest, $19.13 for United, and $21.45 for US Airways. Its planes, for example, the Airbus A320, would in general be more up to date than those of its rivals bringing about lower support costs and no upkeep related fines. The organization expanded flying time by limiting turnaround time. Reservation operators worked at home bringing about cost investment funds when contrasted with a conventional call place. These marks pai d off making a significant upper hands as low working costs that different aircrafts didn't accomplish. Hierarchical culture. JetBlue’s authoritative structure was made dependent on five stages. To start with, the company’s values were resolved. At that point, recruiting administrators chose representatives who reflected the company’s values. Next, the organization guaranteed that the organization surpassed worker desires and to tune in to clients. Also, at last, the organization made an arrangement to drive greatness. The qualities set up by JetBlue were security, mindful, honesty, fun, and energy. For instance, George Forman flame broils were set up at the JFK terminal to permit workers to have some good times. By just recruiting workers that reflected those qualities, the organization could urge employing administrators to be imaginative during the employing procedure and to get rid of those that would not be a fit. By making these means a functioning piece o f completing work, JetBlue built up a solid authoritative culture.

So Long As

Portraying Actions Using While, As, As/So Long As While and as are utilized to portray activities that happen at a similar second that something is in progress. While and as are at times mistaken for the relational word during. Both express a similar thought, yet the structures are unique. While and as are time articulations and take a subject and action word. During is a relational word and is utilized with a thing or thing phrase. Investigate the accompanying guides to take note of the distinction. Notice how the importance continues as before in the two structures: During We talked about the circumstance during lunch. (thing) They are going to visit the Empire State Building during their visit to New York (thing phrase). When/As We examined the circumstance while we were having lunch. (full qualifier time proviso with subject and action word) They are going to visit the Empire State Building as they visit New York. (full intensifier time condition with subject and action word) Future: Use while or as to state something that happens at a similar second that something different - the fundamental focal point of the sentence - significant will happen. Time provision: present basic Fundamental proviso: future structure Models: Would talk about the adjustments as you eat lunch.Shell work out the request subtleties while we examine what to do straightaway. Present: Use while or as to communicate what consistently happens when something different significant happens. This utilization of while and as isn't as basic as the time articulation when. Notice that the relational word during is regularly utilized instead of while or as to communicate a similar thought. Time statement: present straightforward Primary condition: present basic Models: He for the most part eats while he goes for a stroll around the campus.Angela regularly accepts notes as the gathering advances. Past: While and as are utilized in the past to communicate an activity that was happening exactly when something significant occurred. While and as are additionally used to communicate two activities that were going on at a similar second before. Time proviso: past basic OR past constant Principle proviso: past straightforward OR past persistent Models: Doug was drying the dishes while we were watching TV.Peter accepting notes as we examined the merger. During an Entire Period of Time For whatever length of time that thus long as are comparative being used to while and as. In any case, as/insofar as is utilized for longer time of times, while when and as are utilized for increasingly explicit, shorter timeframes. As/insofar as are likewise used to pressure that something will occur, occurs or occurred over the whole timeframe in an unequivocal way. In spite of the fact that models are accommodated ​the past, present and future, as long as thus long as are commonly utilized with future structures. Notice the utilization of tenses: Future: Use so/as long as that something won't occur for the whole timeframe communicated when statement with as/inasmuch as. Time statement: present basic Principle proviso: future structure Models: I will never play golf as long as I live.She will stay away for the indefinite future insofar as she relaxes. Present: Use as/inasmuch as to communicate that something occurs or doesnt occur over the whole timeframe that another occasion happens. Time provision: present basic Fundamental provision: present basic Models: For whatever length of time that he plays piano, I go for a walk.She visits with her month, insofar as her better half needs to do what needs to be done around. Past: Use as/insofar as to depict an activity that did or didnt happen over a more extended timeframe previously. Time proviso: past basic ï » ¿Main proviso: past basic OR past nonstop Models: She didnt get any activity as long as she was working 60 hours a week.Peter didnt appreciate his conversation insofar as he was in the house.

Lm317 Adjustable Voltage Regulator Free Essays

Research about LM317 Positive Adjustable Linear Voltage Regulator: The LM317T is a 3-terminal incorporated circuit which can flexibly a heap ebb and flow of up to 1. 5 Amps with a yield voltage of between 1. 2V and 37 Volts. We will compose a custom exposition test on Lm317 Adjustable Voltage Regulator or then again any comparable point just for you Request Now It acknowledges an information voltage of somewhere in the range of 3 and 40 volts. It tends to be utilized to direct either present or voltage in circumstances where a fixed present or fixed voltage is required. The degree of current or voltage required can be balanced by interfacing the chip in arrangement with a fixed resistor and a potentiometer. The LM317 is additionally a well known variable voltage controller. It was imagined by Robert C. Dobkin and Robert J. Widlar in 1970 while they worked at National Semiconductor. Besides, both line and burden guideline is superior to standard fixed controllers. Notwithstanding having better than fixed controllers, this gadget remembers for chip current restricting, warm over-burden insurance, and safe working region assurance. All over-burden assurance remains completely practical, regardless of whether the change terminal is detached. The LM317 is flexible in its applications, remembering utilizes for programmable yield guideline and nearby on-card guideline. Or on the other hand, by associating a fixed resistor between the alter and yield terminals, the LM317 can work as an exactness current controller. A discretionary yield capacitor can be added to improve transient reaction. The alter terminal can be avoided to accomplish high wave dismissal proportions, which are hard to accomplish with standard three-terminal controllers. LM317 Adjustable Voltage Regulator pin arrangement. LM317 Adjustable Voltage Regulator Internal Block Diagram Operation of the LM317 Adjustable Voltage Regulator: A steady 1. 5V reference voltage (VREF) produces a consistent current (IREF) through R1 paying little mind to the estimation of R2. IREF = VREF/R1 In activity, the LM317 builds up an ostensible 1. 25V reference voltage, VREF, between the yield and change terminal. The reference voltage is intrigued over the resistor R1 and, since the voltage is consistent, a steady present I1 then move through the yield set resistor R2, giving a yield voltage of: VOUT = V REF (1+ R2/R1) + IADJ R2 (The IADJ is regularly a 50 Â µA; it is immaterial in many applications and the information voltage ought to be 2-3V higher than with its yield voltage. Application Information: NOTES: A. Ci isn't required, however is suggested, especially if the controller isn't in nearness to the force gracefully channel capacitors. A 0. 1-? F circle or 1-? F tantalum gives adequate bypassing to most applications, particularly when alteration and yield capacitors are utilized. B. CO improves transient reaction, however isn't required for steadiness. C. The Output Voltage (Because IAdj normally is 50 ? An, it is insignificant in many applications. ) D. CADJ is utilized to improve swell dismissal; it forestalls enhancement of the wave as the yield voltage is balanced higher. In the event that CADJ is utilized, it is ideal to incorporate security diodes. E. In the event that the information is shorted to ground during a shortcoming condition, security diodes give measures to forestall the chance of outside capacitors releasing through low-impedance ways in the IC. By giving low-impedance release ways to CO and CADJ, separately, D1 and D2 keep the capacitors from releasing into the yield of the controller. Schematic Diagram: Solving for IREF: IREF = VREF/R1 IREF = 1. 25V/10000? IREF = 125mA Solving for VOUT(MIN) and VOUT(MAX): VOUT (MIN)/(MAX) = VREF (1+ R2/R1) + IADJ R2 VOUT(MIN) = 1. 25V (1+ 0? /10000? ) + 0. 000050A * 0? VOUT(MIN) = 1. 25V VOUT(MAX) = 1. 25V (1+ 50000? /10000? ) + 0. 000050A * 50000? VOUT(MAX) = 10V (Therefore, the base info voltage that so as to flexibly its most extreme yield voltage is 12V. ) List of Components: Name| Type| Symbol| Material| Description| LM317 (IC) | Adjustable Linear Voltage Regulator| | It is a movable three-terminal positive voltage controller equipped for providing mutiple. 5A over a yield voltage scope of 1. 5 V to 37 V. | Potentiometer| Variable Resistor| | Informally, a pot, in gadgets innovation is a part, a three-terminal resistor with a sliding contact that shapes a flexible voltage divider. On the off chance that lone two terminals are utilized, one end and the wiper, it goes about as a variable resistor or rheostat. | Ceramic Capacitor| Unpolarized| | It is a two-terminal non-polar gadget that is developed of substituting layers of metal and fired, with t he clay material going about as the dielectric. | Name| Type| Symbol| Material| Description| Electrolytic capacitor| Polarized| | Formerly known as condenser, is an aloof two-terminal electrical segment used to store vitality in an electric field. | Resistor| Carbon Film| | It is a detached two-terminal electrical part that actualizes electrical obstruction as a circuit component. The current through a resistor is in direct extent to the voltage over the resistor’s terminals. | Diode| Rectifier| | It is a two-terminal electronic parts that permit current to stream in just a single course, from an anode (+) to a cathode (- ), and that convert AC to DC. Segment Layout: PCB Design Layout: Conclusion: I saw that the yield voltage of the controller (LM317) is rely upon the R1 and R2 in light of the fact that when the R2 is set to least yield obstruction, the yield voltage lessening to its base worth that is equivalent to the voltage reference (VREF) while it is set to the greatest opposition, its yield voltage will increment and it will arrive at its most extreme yield vol tage that it can flexibly. As I stated, that the yield voltage can control and set it to the worth that you wanted or enough to gracefully a heap or a circuit. The most effective method to refer to Lm317 Adjustable Voltage Regulator, Essay models

Do You Know the Rules of the Waitlist

Cmon you know you want to! Think you know how to  write an effective waitlist letter? Test your knowledge with the following quiz: 1.  Waitlist letters may be three or more single-spaced pages long: (a) if the applicant has a lot of accomplishments to talk about (b) they should never exceed two pages (c) if they are law school waitlist letters only (d) if you are not enclosing an additional letter of recommendation 2. Expressing some frustration or disappointment in the waitlist letter about not being immediately accepted is: (a) OK if the school is really your number-one choice (b) appropriate if it reflects how you honestly feel (c) never a good idea (d) useful in the letter’s conclusion to elicit sympathy 3. During the waitlist process, you should generally aim to contact the waitlisting school: (a) every other day if it’s really your number-one choice (b) weekly by email or  mail (c) only when prompted by the school (d) every three to four weeks (if the school allows contact) 4. The main topics of a waitlist letter should be: (a) your recent professional achievements (b) new reasons why this school is a good fit for you (c) developments in your community work since applying (d) any substantial recent examples that offset the weaknesses of your application (e) all of the above 5. It’s acceptable to repeat wording from your application essays in the waitlist letter: (a) never (b) if you are in a rush to get the letter done on time (c) if it was an especially strong part of your application (d) if you think it’s important enough to reinforce [Answers: 1b,   2c, 3d, 4e, 5a] Howd you do? Do you have a solid understanding of how waitlist letters work? Do you need help drafting a waitlist letter that will turn the schools unsure verdict into a solid, resounding acceptance? We can help! Check out our waitlist services for more info. hbspt.cta.load(58291, '04564dbf-3cad-4f7f-b407-ca8a097dd058', {}); For 25 years, Accepted has helped applicants gain acceptance to top undergraduate and graduate programs. Our expert team of admissions consultants features former admissions directors, PhDs, and professional writers who have advised clients to acceptance at top programs worldwide including Harvard, Stanford, Yale, Princeton, Penn, Columbia, Oxford, Cambridge, INSEAD, MIT, Caltech, UC Berkeley, and Northwestern. Want an admissions expert  to help you get Accepted? Click here to get in touch! Related Resources: †¢Ã‚  Help! Ive Been Waitlisted!, podcast †¢Ã‚  3 Topics to Discuss in Waitlist Correspondence, short video †¢Ã‚  How to Write Waitlist Update Letters Do You Know the Rules of the Waitlist Cmon you know you want to! Think you know how to  write an effective waitlist letter? Test your knowledge with the following quiz: 1.  Waitlist letters may be three or more single-spaced pages long: (a) if the applicant has a lot of accomplishments to talk about (b) they should never exceed two pages (c) if they are law school waitlist letters only (d) if you are not enclosing an additional letter of recommendation 2. Expressing some frustration or disappointment in the waitlist letter about not being immediately accepted is: (a) OK if the school is really your number-one choice (b) appropriate if it reflects how you honestly feel (c) never a good idea (d) useful in the letter’s conclusion to elicit sympathy 3. During the waitlist process, you should generally aim to contact the waitlisting school: (a) every other day if it’s really your number-one choice (b) weekly by email or  mail (c) only when prompted by the school (d) every three to four weeks (if the school allows contact) 4. The main topics of a waitlist letter should be: (a) your recent professional achievements (b) new reasons why this school is a good fit for you (c) developments in your community work since applying (d) any substantial recent examples that offset the weaknesses of your application (e) all of the above 5. It’s acceptable to repeat wording from your application essays in the waitlist letter: (a) never (b) if you are in a rush to get the letter done on time (c) if it was an especially strong part of your application (d) if you think it’s important enough to reinforce [Answers: 1b,   2c, 3d, 4e, 5a] Howd you do? Do you have a solid understanding of how waitlist letters work? Do you need help drafting a waitlist letter that will turn the schools unsure verdict into a solid, resounding acceptance? We can help! Check out our waitlist services for more info. hbspt.cta.load(58291, '04564dbf-3cad-4f7f-b407-ca8a097dd058', {}); For 25 years, Accepted has helped applicants gain acceptance to top undergraduate and graduate programs. Our expert team of admissions consultants features former admissions directors, PhDs, and professional writers who have advised clients to acceptance at top programs worldwide including Harvard, Stanford, Yale, Princeton, Penn, Columbia, Oxford, Cambridge, INSEAD, MIT, Caltech, UC Berkeley, and Northwestern. Want an admissions expert  to help you get Accepted? Click here to get in touch! Related Resources: †¢Ã‚  Help! Ive Been Waitlisted!, podcast †¢Ã‚  3 Topics to Discuss in Waitlist Correspondence, short video †¢Ã‚  How to Write Waitlist Update Letters

Racism Argumentative Essay

What is racism? The typical dictionary would state it is the prejudice or discrimination that is directed against individuals with different beliefs or race. Unfortunately, racism can be seen almost everywhere.even in a high school. Teasing, name-calling, bullying, verbal abuse and exclusion – all these forms of racism can be nowadays observed in high schools, where all kinds of people – be it teachers, pupils or workers – face with negative effects of racism. Students representing different races find it extremely hard to make friends with their peers from the other â€Å"races circles†. When things like that happen, sociability is compromised, which means there is no social growth observed within the communities. One more reason why racism should be eliminated lies within the fact that some students reject their own parental and culture values. When being discriminated for their culture, students begin to make themselves fit the mainstream culture. As a result, they abandon their parental and cultural values just to avoid prejudice. This leads to the identity confusion. Young people don’t know who they are anymore and what place they really belong to. Racism has also been one of the core reasons of drop out cases at schools. Being discriminated, students start hating school and, as a result, stay away from it. They give preference to stay in rather than meet the ones who tease them. It’s no wonder that they end up dropping out of school. This, in turn, has a major negative effect on their lives. They end up getting frustrated and even involved on crimes in order to somehow make a living. Have the teachers been somehow affected by racism? Definitely. They are being teased either by the fellow teachers or students, and, as a result, they lose confidence in their professional ability to teach and passion for teaching. They end up with being unwilling to go to work and have a depression. This significantly lowers their academic performance that affects the education system, as a whole. This is one more solid argument why should racism be totally eliminated. You will be impressed to know that some people have tried to point out some positive sides of racism. According to the viewpoints of some of them, the racist experience can help an individual to grow into a stronger person. How do they argue this? To their mind, one can gain more pronounced resilience levels in the process of resisting and respond to the marginalization and discrimination. This argument has been an error from the very beginning. The thing is that racism has been proven to cause self doubts and low self esteem that can turn an individual into a weak and unhappy person. School teachers, students and their parents – they cannot become stronger and more successful as a result of racism. Therefore, racism is now one of the most crucial social vices and we must address it in the most serious way. Racism has become the reason of lower academic performance. Besides, it has also affected the health statement of its victims and highly compromised sociality in high schools. All the effects mentioned above have resulted in weak community – high school relations and poor educational segment. Without a doubt, it is highly important to take anti-racism measures in schools in order to prevent the sad racism cases in the future.

Being Raised As Slaves By Harriet Jacobs And Frederick...

Being raised as slaves; both Harriet Jacobs and Frederick Douglass devoted their professional life for telling their true story based on their own experience. As a matter of fact, their works â€Å"Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl† (1861) and â€Å"Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave† (1845) are considered the most important works in the genre of slave narrative or of enslavement. Thus, this paper will compare and contrast between Jacobs and Douglass in terms of the aforementioned works. Losing their mothers and realizing their status as slaves at about the same age; Douglass and Jacobs’s feelings are different, for example, looking at the beginning of Jacobs’s autobiography, it is evident that she extremely filled with grief and sadness about losing her mother: â€Å"I grieved for her, and my young mind was troubled with the thought who would now take care of me and my little brother.† (Baym, Nina, and Robert 923). Jacobs soon after the death of her mother was given into the hands of her grandmother, Aunt Marthy. In fact, the relation between Jacobs and her grandmother prove to be a most beneficial gift for her; In other words, her grandmother played the role of mother in Jacob’s life. In contrast to Jacobs, Douglass seems indifferent from losing his mother and he says, â€Å"I received the tidings of her death with much the same emotions I should have probably felt at the death of a stranger (1183). He doesn’t know exactly about his father’s identity. HeShow MoreRelatedA Comparison Of Writings By Harriet Jacobs And Frederick Douglass1718 Words   |  7 PagesA Comparison of Writings by Harriet Jacobs and Frederick Douglass In this paper I will compare the writings of Harriet Jacobs and Frederick Douglass. I will touch on their genre, purpose, content, and style. Both authors were born into slavery. Both escaped to freedom and fought to bring an end to slavery, each in their own way. Both Jacobs and Douglass have a different purpose for their writings. Harriet Jacobs and Frederick Douglass were both slaves that wrote about their strugglesRead MoreBeloved by Toni Morrison1455 Words   |  6 Pagessuffered horrifically. Not many slaves knew their mothers because they were torn from their homes. Many slave women were robbed of their innocence by their masters. Behind the face of every slave, there is always a very traumatic unforgettable story which is not something to pass on, but a lesson to remember from repeating same mistake again. Only a handful of slaves learned to read and write, and from their stories we can read the horrors they went through. Slave narratives brings these hardshipsRead MoreFrederick Douglass And Harriet Jacobs Essay1765 Words   |  8 Pageswho tackle this painful topic are Frederick Douglass and Harriet Jacobs. Both Douglass and Jacobs provide deep insights into the life of slavery by recounting their actual experiences. These autobiographies possess great power, though they are by no means carbon cop ies of each other. There are more familial elements in Harriet’s account than Douglass’s, providing a more complex view in Harriet’s case. In addition, while both slaves clash with their masters, Douglass relies on more straightforward tacticsRead MoreSlavery in America1124 Words   |  5 PagesBut do people truly understand how hard it was for the African American female slaves? Harriet Jacobs goes into detail about her life as a slave and gives the female perspective under the alias Linda Brent in the novel Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl. She states that everything she says in the book is completely true. There are stereotypes of black women during this time: being looked upon as sexual objects and being promiscuous. Jacobs’s attempts to resist the stereotypical images of black womenRead MoreEssay about Dehumanization of Humanity1341 Words   |  6 PagesSince the Declaration of Independence America has been the land of the free. Every man was born with inalienable rights that could not be separated from their being. When God created the world he made man king of all the animals and plants and America was the first country to realize this. Well, that is unless that man was from African roots. By simply having a different skin color certain men no longer seemed to have that inalienable right to rule over the earth, plants and animals; rather theyRead More Interpretations of Slavery Essay3734 Words   |  15 Pagesare present in all forms of slavery. Slaves were property and objects, not subjects of the law. Slaves had few rights, always fewer than their owners. Slave were also limited to few social activities and were not allowed to participate in political decisions. Finally, any earnings aquired by slaves by law belonged to their master. Also, slaves were prevented from making their own choices regarding physical reproduction. Western slavery took each of these slave characteristics to a new level and asRead MoreHarriet Jacob : An African American Slave And Feminist1071 Words   |  5 PagesHarriet Jacob: An African American Slave and Feminist â€Å"Reader, be assured this narrative is no fiction† (Author). Harriet Jacobs’ Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, is her narrative as a slave who lived in a slave state for twenty-seven years before escaping to live as a free woman in New York (Jacobs preface). Jacobs’ was motivated to write her story by a deep desire to share her experience in an effort to bring to light what slavery really was, a â€Å"deep, and dark, and foul experience thatRead MoreHow Personal Values And Beliefs Influenced The Black American Slave Narrative1572 Words   |  7 PagesBeliefs Influenced the Black American Slave Narrative: â€Å"Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl† and Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass† Compared. Throughout the abolition movement, both men and women slaves were trying to escape from slavery, and find their way to freedom in the North. Many of wrote their stories down. Some with the aid of ghost writers, and often under pseudonyms to protect their safety. These slave narratives spoke of the sufferings of the slave experience in America (CampbellRead MoreThe Narrative Of The Life Of Frederick Douglass2047 Words   |  9 PagesFrederick Douglass was an African American social reformer, orator, and writer. He became the leader of the of the abolitionist movement after escaping from slavery and publishing his autobiography, The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass. His narrative showed white anti-slavery sympathizers, how slaves were brutalized by the slave holding system. Harriet Jacobs was an African American writer who escaped from slavery and was later freed. She became an abolitionist speaker and reformer. JacobsRead MoreFrederick Douglass And Harriet Jacobs Essay1335 Words   |  6 PagesBoth Frederick Douglass and Harriet Jacobs had similar experiences in regards to their owners getting more involved with religion resulting in a change in the treatment of their slaves. Frederick Douglass’ slave-owner in 1832 was a man called â€Å"Captain Auld† by his slaves. Douglass describes him as a â€Å"slaveholder without the ability to hold slaves†. However, after attending a Methodist camp-meeting and experiencing religion, Auld becomes crueler. Douglass had the slightest hope that Auld’s involvement

Analysis of Caius Cassius Character free essay sample

The driving force behind the conspiracy is Cassius though there are others who are unhappy with the state of affairs under the prevailing system. Yet, they do not take an active part in the design to get rid of powerful Caesar. So, it is not incorrect to state that the chief protagonist of the assassination plot is no one but Caius Cassius. Let me have men about me that are fat; Sleek-headed men, and such as sleep onights: Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look; He thinks too much: such men are dangerous. Act1. ii. In the Act 1 Scene ii of the play, we come across the above quotation where Caesar expresses, to Mark Antony, his assessment of Cassius’ personality although the latter plays down Caesar’s fear of Cassius stating that he is not a dangerous individual but a noble Roman. Caesar’s estimation of Cassius encapsulates in a nutshell the true face of a schemer who is out to deter, through jealousy or to gain personal advantages, the advancement of others. We do not know the truth behind this assertion. But Caesar believes firmly that Cassius is a person with evil intentions. Let us find out, based on the facts in the play, whether what Caesar believes is true. The initial appearance of Cassius, in the play, is in the Act 1. ii where he meets Brutus and joins him in conversation. Being a subtle thinker who visualizes everything from all standpoints, it is reasonable to conclude that he had not failed to pre-plan minutely the plot prior to his implanting the embryo, against Caesar, in Brutus’ mind. Cassius is crafty enough not to touch upon the topic directly. First he tries to find out Brutus’ personal opinion about Caesar’s authoritarian rule. So, he drifts the conversation towards that direction when Brutus drops the casual hint: â€Å"Nor construe any further my neglect Than that poor Brutus, with himself at war,† Act 1. ii. From this point onward, he manipulates on Brutus’ egotism by praising the noble role his ancestors had played in the past in the affairs of the country, and also Brutus for the high respect that the Romans have towards him. By means of this ingenious mechanism he tries to create in Brutus the normal human feeling â€Å"If people hold me in such esteem, I am better than Caesar. See the next question Cassius poses to Brutus: â€Å"Tell me, good Brutus, can you see your face? † Act 1. ii. How skilfully he plays his card to win Brutus over to his side! He handles the whole subject as an expert at negotiation. Cassius’ endeavour does not stop here. He pursues it still more vigo rously. Now it takes a different turn. He presents to Brutus a Caesar who is not as courageous or valiant as people think him to be. To buttress his claim, he relates two incidents where Caesar showed his cowardice. One of which is the incident where Cassius and Caesar jumped into the raging Tiber to swim to the other side. Before being able to reach the bank, Caesar got into difficulties and screamed for help. It was Cassius who saved him from drowning. What is Cassius driving at? Here he compares Caesar with Brutus and implies that, when there are greater men like Brutus, in the Republic of Rome, why should they remain passive under the yoke of a tyrant? This argument succeeds partially to win over Brutus’ co-operation for Cassius’ plan. It is a great achievement for him, for it is not a simple task to convince an idealist of the calibre of Brutus to commit an action that will spill out blood. After preparing the preliminary ground and getting Brutus’ consent to think over the subject, Cassius does not remain idle. He pursues the issue relentlessly to ensure that Brutus will not change his mind. He writes some notes, under different hands, as if coming from several citizens and causes them to be thrown into his room at night for him to read. The general tenor of the writing is that Rome holds Brutus in high esteem and respect and he should not be silent when the country is in dire need of his leadership to overthrow the tyrant. The strategy succeeds in obtaining Brutus’ whole-hearted involvement in the conspiracy when he says, â€Å"‘Speak, strike, redress! ’ Am I entreated To speak and strike? O Rome, I make thee promise, If the redress will follow, thou receivest Thy full petition at the hand of Brutus! † Act 2. ii. Though the method employed to convert Brutus is quite unprincipled, it shows, no doubt, the skill of a practical man to achieve his objective by hook or by crook. Hence, it can be counted as a plus point in his character. Brutus’ patriotism and self-love impede him from seeing the deep chasm to which he is pushed by artful manipulation. Unlike Brutus, Cassius is a far-sighted man. He is aware of the capability of Antony and his solid friendship with Caesar. An important item in his plan is to get rid of Mark Antony as well, along with Caesar since he concludes that he is a potential danger to their cause. But this is over-ruled by Brutus on the premise that it will foul their good intention. Brutus’ reaction to the suggestion is: â€Å"Let’s be sacrificers, but not butchers, Caius. † Act 2 Scene i. What takes place later fully justifies the stand taken by Cassius with regard to Antony. If Brutus agreed with Cassius, the conspiracy would have been a complete success. Brutus permits Antony to make a funeral oration at Caesar’s burial. Again Cassius objects to Antony being allowed to speak for he sees it dangerous, and this is his reaction: â€Å"You know not what you do. Do not consent That Antony speaks in his funeral. † Act 3 Scene i. Why did such a far-sighted man as Cassius, who felt that there was a potential threat from Antony in the event of him being allowed to live and permitted to deliver Caesar’s funeral oration, meekly succumb to Brutus’ objections and keep mute? As this is a relevant question which bears on Cassius’ true character, it is important that there is some acceptable explanation to the position adopted by him. It is a well-known fact that Cassius’ endeavour to get the co-operation of Brutus to assassinate Caesar is based on the hypothesis that it can succeed only if Brutus is their chief co-conspirator. Relying on this theory, he does not want to commit anything that is liable to displease Brutus. He thinks that, if Brutus is annoyed and comes to the conclusion that the assassination is done to achieve some personal ends and not for the common good of the country, Brutus will not hesitate to wash his hands off the plot. In order to prevent this possibility, Cassius remains silent and this is the serious weakness in his character. This finally becomes the fatal flaw in the bid to get rid of the dictatorship. If Cassius explained to Brutus in greater detail the danger of permitting Antony to deliver the funeral oration, the fatal end of the conspiracy could have been avoided. This is not in keeping with the manoeuvring skill of a man like Cassius. If he can convince Brutus to support the conspirators, it is not impossible for him to get Brutus to block Antony being given the opportunity of speaking at the funeral. Cassius is undoubtedly a superb schemer. He is able to win over to his side an idealist like Brutus to assassinate his good friend, Caesar. However, he fails in his endeavour to liquidate Mark Antony and block his delivering the funeral oration at Caesar’s burial. His failure to explain the inherent dangers posed by Antony convincingly to Brutus, who does not see the reality due to his extreme idealism, is an indelible black mark on his character as a skilful schemer. Though the conspirators succeed in assassinating Caesar, yet they get themselves liquidated as a result of Mark Antony’s dexterous manipulation of the popular anger against them. So, Cassius and Brutus should be held responsible for the unnecessary massacre that ensues and both of them kill themselves by their own hands before they are captured by the forces commanded by AntonÃ'Æ'.